Periodic Inspections
Temperatures, consumption, cycles, or levels are read only during a shift or at the end of a shift.
We connect existing sensors, devices, and systems to useful dashboards and alerts. The team can see what’s changing, where to take action, and which events require attention.
Luxygroup designs the process from the field to the decision: we collect data from machines and systems, track its history over time, and transform it into metrics and notifications that are useful to the team.
Manual checks and delayed reporting make it difficult to distinguish between a single incident and a pattern. The cost is reflected in downtime, waste, travel expenses, and decisions based on gut feelings.
Temperatures, consumption, cycles, or levels are read only during a shift or at the end of a shift.
Reports arrive late or too frequently, without a history and without specifying who should take action.
PLCs, meters, and devices generate data that does not reach dashboards and business systems.
Action is taken after the shutdown because previous trends and anomalies are not visible or comparable.
Measuring everything isn't helpful. What matters is measuring what influences a decision. Let's start with the event you want to avoid or the metric that's currently missing, then choose sensors, monitoring frequency, and alerts that are consistent with the operational context.
Describe your situationDevices, connectivity, the platform, and the interface are designed as a single workflow, with a focus on real-world conditions, continuity, and maintenance.
Availability, downtime, quantities, and events compiled into a history that the team can access.
Meters and gauges are compared over time to identify waste and unusual patterns.
Temperature, humidity, access, or other parameters monitored with thresholds and logs.
Vehicles and equipment that are easier to locate, assign, and monitor throughout their operational cycle.
Who uses it, what data goes into it, where it slows down, and what it costs today.
Let's agree on what needs to be improved and what indicators we can use to measure that improvement.
Let's write the most useful block of code, test it with real-world examples, and correct it right away.
New features and integrations are coming after we've seen the value of the first release.
We assess the environment, power supply, connectivity, protocols, frequency, and the people involved. If an existing device meets the need, we integrate it rather than reinventing it.
Clear answers regarding feasibility, risks, and how we work—before committing time and budget.
Usually not. We check the protocols, available signals, and the possibility of adding gateways or sensors. The goal is to integrate existing systems when it is technically safe and sustainable to do so.
It depends on the criticality. We can provide for local data collection, deferred transmission, edge computing, and connection status alerts. Continuity is designed based on the actual context.
Yes. The project covers the entire process from data to decision: acquisition, transmission, storage, dashboards, thresholds, notifications, and integration with other systems.
Yes. A limited trial allows you to validate the signal, connectivity, frequency, usefulness of alerts, and the team’s use of the system before rolling it out.
We separate devices, credentials, communications, and access based on the architecture. Updates, encryption, roles, and traceability are defined in conjunction with infrastructure constraints.
It depends on the number of data points, sensors, environment, connectivity, frequency, dashboards, and integrations. After the technical site survey or requirements gathering, we propose an initial, verifiable scope.
Describe the machine, system, or asset and how it is currently monitored. We’ll help you identify the first useful piece of data to collect and the simplest test to perform.